Cuban vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Cuban
 Japanese
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Cubans
Japanese
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,114,501 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Japanese | 
| Minimum | 0.45% | 0.93% | 
| Maximum | 10.0% | 18.5% | 
| Range | 9.5% | 17.6% | 
| Mean | 6.1% | 7.5% | 
| Median | 6.1% | 6.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 5.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.9% | 7.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 3.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Japanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Czechoslovakian (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican (6.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Slavic (6.4%, a difference of 0.33%), and Honduran (6.3%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |