Immigrants from Iraq vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iraq
Japanese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Iraq
Japanese
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
12.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iraq vs Japanese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,765,362 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,121,214 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.193 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.23%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Iraq | Japanese |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 0.93% |
| Maximum | 11.5% | 18.5% |
| Range | 7.8% | 17.6% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 7.5% |
| Median | 6.4% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iraq and Japanese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iraq are Bangladeshi (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Alsatian (6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |