Lumbee vs Subsaharan African Male Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
 Subsaharan African
 Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Lumbee
Sub-Saharan Africans
15.2%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
MALE DISABILITY
2.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Subsaharan African Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,279,145 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,010,863 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 29.5%.
 
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Subsaharan African | 
| Minimum | 2.2% | 3.6% | 
| Maximum | 38.1% | 38.5% | 
| Range | 35.8% | 34.8% | 
| Mean | 18.5% | 13.8% | 
| Median | 18.0% | 11.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 11.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.6% | 13.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 2.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 6.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 6.0% | 
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Chickasaw (15.1%, a difference of 0.74%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 15.1%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 15.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 15.4%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 15.4%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 16.5%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 17.4%  | 
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (11.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Japanese (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bahamas (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Austrian (11.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Alsatian (11.7%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability | 
| Panamanians | 3.8 /100 | #219  | Tragic 11.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 3.8 /100 | #220  | Tragic 11.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 3.7 /100 | #221  | Tragic 11.7%  | 
| Alsatians | 3.3 /100 | #222  | Tragic 11.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 3.2 /100 | #223  | Tragic 11.7%  | 
| Japanese | 3.1 /100 | #224  | Tragic 11.7%  | 
| Liberians | 3.1 /100 | #225  | Tragic 11.8%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.8 /100 | #226  | Tragic 11.8%  | 
| Austrians | 2.5 /100 | #227  | Tragic 11.8%  | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.3 /100 | #228  | Tragic 11.8%  | 
| Bermudans | 2.3 /100 | #229  | Tragic 11.8%  | 
| Croatians | 2.1 /100 | #230  | Tragic 11.8%  | 
| Dominicans | 1.8 /100 | #231  | Tragic 11.8%  | 
| Malaysians | 1.8 /100 | #232  | Tragic 11.8%  | 
| Mexicans | 1.7 /100 | #233  | Tragic 11.8%  |