Japanese vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,299,212 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,895,978 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 1.7%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Japanese	Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Minimum	2.8%	2.1%
Maximum	22.2%	56.9%
Range	19.4%	54.8%
Mean	9.2%	15.5%
Median	8.2%	11.2%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.8%	7.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.1%	17.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	9.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	13.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.6%	13.2%

Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Middle Africa (8.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Greece (8.3%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from West Indies (8.3%, a difference of 0.45%), Sudanese (8.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (8.3%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Burmese (8.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Serbia (8.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Panama (8.2%, a difference of 0.14%), South American Indian (8.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.2%, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Burmese	99.2 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	99.2 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.2 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Panama	99.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 8.2%
South American Indians	99.1 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	99.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	99.0 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Honduras	99.0 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 8.2%
Sri Lankans	98.9 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 8.2%
Laotians	98.8 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	98.8 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 8.2%
Marshallese	98.7 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 8.2%
French American Indians	98.7 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| India	98.6 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 8.2%
Asians	98.5 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 8.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	98.4 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 8.3%
Sudanese	98.2 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 8.3%
Immigrants \| West Indies	98.1 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 8.3%
Immigrants \| Greece	97.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 8.3%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 8.3%
Japanese	97.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 8.3%