Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Subsaharan African
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,616,042 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,474,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 13.9%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 0.79% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 7.0% | 9.3% |
Range | 6.2% | 9.0% |
Mean | 2.2% | 2.6% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 0.74% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.93% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.93% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from South Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Romanian (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Estonian (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Greek (2.1%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 96.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 96.0 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Australians | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Romanians | 95.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Estonians | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Greeks | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Albanians | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Austria | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Italy | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |