Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Vision Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Eastern Europe Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,588 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,183,449 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.82%.

Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Eastern Europe |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.27% |
| Maximum | 6.4% | 13.4% |
| Range | 6.0% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 0.70% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.00% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Eastern Europe by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Paraguayan (2.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Palestinian (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (2.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | France | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Palestinians | 98.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Paraguayans | 98.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% |