Chinese vs Lithuanian Vision Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
 Lithuanian
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Chinese
Lithuanians
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
97.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Lithuanian Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,588 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,489,399 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.471 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 0.34%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Lithuanian | 
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.23% | 
| Maximum | 6.4% | 14.7% | 
| Range | 6.0% | 14.5% | 
| Mean | 2.3% | 3.0% | 
| Median | 2.1% | 2.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 3.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.78% | 1.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.00% | 2.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Lithuanians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Moldova (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Switzerland (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (2.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.0%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Soviet Union (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Poland (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Western Asia (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Latvia (2.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Immigrants | France | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Palestinians | 98.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Paraguayans | 98.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Lithuanians | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Soviet Union | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 97.5 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Chinese | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 97.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Norwegians | 97.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.0% | 
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 96.7 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Somalia | 96.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.1% | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.2 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.1% |