South American Indian vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability
COMPARE
South American Indian
Subsaharan African
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
South American Indians
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
57.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,540,973 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,474,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 8.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American Indian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.64% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 7.1% | 9.3% |
| Range | 6.4% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| Median | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.6% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Swiss (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Brazilian (2.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Africa (2.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from England (2.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Hungarians | 67.4 /100 | #162 | Good 2.1% |
| Icelanders | 66.1 /100 | #163 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 65.5 /100 | #164 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 64.8 /100 | #165 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |