Tsimshian vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability
COMPARE
Tsimshian
 Subsaharan African
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Tsimshian
Sub-Saharan Africans
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.377 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,474,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 36.4%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Subsaharan African | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.34% | 
| Maximum | 5.5% | 9.3% | 
| Range | 3.9% | 9.0% | 
| Mean | 3.8% | 2.6% | 
| Median | 3.5% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 2.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 0.74% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.6% | 
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |