Chippewa vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability
COMPARE
Chippewa
 Subsaharan African
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Chippewa
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,949,512 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,474,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 3.9%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Subsaharan African | 
| Minimum | 0.77% | 0.34% | 
| Maximum | 8.4% | 9.3% | 
| Range | 7.6% | 9.0% | 
| Mean | 3.1% | 2.6% | 
| Median | 2.7% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 2.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 0.74% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.6% | 
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Scotch-Irish (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Bahamian (2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Spanish (2.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Nepalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 2.5% | 
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 2.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Liberian (2.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |