Welsh vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability
COMPARE
Welsh
Subsaharan African
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Welsh
Sub-Saharan Africans
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Subsaharan African Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,426,081 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,474,731 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 2.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 9.3% |
| Range | 38.9% | 9.0% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 2.6% |
| Median | 3.0% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 0.74% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Sub-Saharan Africans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Nicaraguan (2.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Hmong (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ecuador (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), German Russian (2.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and Central American (2.3%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Guatemalan (2.3%, a difference of 0.020%), French (2.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Alsatian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from West Indies (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Hmong | 2.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Welsh | 2.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 2.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 2.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 2.3% |
| German Russians | 1.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Central Americans | 1.8 /100 | #233 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Scottish | 1.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Marshallese | 1.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.4 /100 | #236 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 1.1 /100 | #238 | Tragic 2.3% |
| English | 1.1 /100 | #239 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Panamanians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Malaysians | 0.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 0.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
| French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |