Iraqi vs Immigrants from Thailand Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Iraqi
Immigrants from Thailand
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Iraqis
Immigrants from Thailand
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
3.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iraqi vs Immigrants from Thailand Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,619,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,791,227 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 0.43%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iraqi | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 0.30% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 4.7% | 6.9% |
| Range | 4.4% | 6.1% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 3.0% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.94% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.81% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.81% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iraqis and Immigrants from Thailand by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are Chinese (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Osage (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Philippines (2.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Guatemalan (2.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Spaniard (2.6%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are White/Caucasian (2.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Celtic (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Ecuadorian (2.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Scotch-Irish (2.6%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Spaniards | 3.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.6% |
| French Canadians | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Osage | 3.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Iraqis | 3.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Chinese | 2.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 2.7 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Guatemalans | 2.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 2.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 2.6% |