Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Swiss
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Swiss
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
43.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
181st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,822,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.95%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Swiss |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.81% |
| Maximum | 20.2% | 26.5% |
| Range | 18.6% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 8.5% | 7.5% |
| Median | 7.1% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Thailand (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Scandinavian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |