Immigrants from Kenya vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,109,289 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Immigrant from Kenya communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.873. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kenya within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.095% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kenya corresponds to an increase of 1,094.8 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,661 compared to $55,082, a difference of 29.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,767 compared to $112,575, a difference of 24.0%), and median male earnings ($53,427 compared to $66,125, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,633 compared to $54,830, a difference of 10.5%), median female earnings ($39,535 compared to $44,587, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,710 compared to $69,703, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 19.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.18%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.3% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 58.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 51.3%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kenya and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.0%).