U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Saudi Arabia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,320,810 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Saudi Arabia within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.206% in Immigrants from Saudi Arabia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 205.5 Immigrants from Saudi Arabia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($85,294 compared to $108,544, a difference of 27.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $105,249, a difference of 27.2%), and wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $46,187, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $39,952, a difference of 9.7%), and median earnings ($41,448 compared to $47,704, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 56.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (22.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 36.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 4.0%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 45.3%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 36.2%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.85%), family households (62.6% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 49.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 81.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 62.0%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.8%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.9%).