Immigrants from Uganda vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Sudanese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Sudanese
10.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
76.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uganda vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,911,604 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,072,180 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 1.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uganda | Sudanese |
Minimum | 0.97% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 21.9% | 86.7% |
Range | 20.9% | 86.3% |
Mean | 8.5% | 10.6% |
Median | 7.7% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda and Sudanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |