Blackfeet vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Sudanese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Blackfeet
Sudanese
9.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
91.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,020,066 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,072,180 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 2.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 34.9% | 86.7% |
| Range | 33.8% | 86.3% |
| Mean | 9.4% | 10.6% |
| Median | 7.6% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet and Sudanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Immigrants from Korea (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Cameroon (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Costa Rican (9.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Icelander (9.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |