Salvadoran vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Sudanese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Salvadorans
Sudanese
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,977,733 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,072,180 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 2.3%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Sudanese |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 25.9% | 86.7% |
| Range | 24.7% | 86.3% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 10.6% |
| Median | 8.9% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans and Sudanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |