Immigrants from Belize vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belize
Sudanese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Belize
Sudanese
15.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
83.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belize vs Sudanese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,253,773 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.308 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,072,180 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 56.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belize | Sudanese |
Minimum | 0.48% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 35.6% | 86.7% |
Range | 35.1% | 86.3% |
Mean | 11.4% | 10.6% |
Median | 10.3% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.0% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belize by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Immigrants from Haiti (15.4%, a difference of 0.13%), U.S. Virgin Islander (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Puerto Rican (15.5%, a difference of 0.82%), Immigrants from China (15.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Greece | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 14.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | China | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.4% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.5% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |