Celtic vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment
COMPARE
Celtic
Czechoslovakian
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Celtics
Czechoslovakians
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Czechoslovakian Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,747,363 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,083,136 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.581 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 14.3% | 40.9% |
| Range | 13.9% | 39.6% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 7.8% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Czechoslovakians by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Australian (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Eastern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), White/Caucasian (4.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Bolivian (4.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Lithuanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Northern European (4.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| French Canadians | 99.3 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Australians | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |