Celtic vs Bhutanese Unemployment
COMPARE
Celtic
Bhutanese
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Celtics
Bhutanese
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Bhutanese Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,747,363 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,875,452 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.20%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 14.3% | 9.9% |
| Range | 13.9% | 9.3% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 4.7% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Bhutanese by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Singapore (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Greek (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Eastern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Greek (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Cambodian (4.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Icelander (4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| French Canadians | 99.3 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Australians | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Greeks | 99.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Icelanders | 98.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Italians | 98.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.8 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slovaks | 98.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| New Zealanders | 98.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.9% |