Celtic vs Filipino Unemployment
COMPARE
Celtic
Filipino
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Celtics
Filipinos
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Filipino Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,747,363 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,275,542 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | Filipino |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 14.3% | 8.8% |
| Range | 13.9% | 7.7% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 4.5% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Filipinos by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Singapore (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Greek (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Eastern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Bhutanese (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Yugoslavian (4.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Austrian (4.8%, a difference of 0.26%), French (4.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from Nepal (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Lithuanians | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 99.5 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 99.5 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Austrians | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| French Canadians | 99.3 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Australians | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Greeks | 99.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |