Celtic vs Australian Unemployment
COMPARE
Celtic
Australian
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Celtics
Australians
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Australian Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,747,363 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.006 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,052,970 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.16%.

Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Australian |
Minimum | 0.40% | 0.90% |
Maximum | 14.3% | 18.9% |
Range | 13.9% | 18.0% |
Mean | 5.5% | 5.3% |
Median | 4.8% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 5.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 1.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and Australians by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Singapore (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Greek (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Eastern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Bhutanese (4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Eastern European (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), White/Caucasian (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Singapore (4.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
French | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.4 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.4 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.8% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.3 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
French Canadians | 99.3 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Australians | 99.2 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Celtics | 99.1 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.1 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Greeks | 99.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cambodians | 99.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Icelanders | 98.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Italians | 98.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.8 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |