Immigrants from Israel vs New Zealander Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
New Zealander
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Israel
New Zealanders
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel vs New Zealander Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,930,227 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,891,318 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.35%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 37.1% | 32.1% |
| Range | 36.6% | 29.3% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 9.6% |
| Median | 9.1% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel and New Zealanders by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |