Welsh vs Icelander Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Welsh
Icelander
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Welsh
Icelanders
22.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Icelander Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,029,164 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.501 and weighted average of 22.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,245,143 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Welsh | Icelander |
Minimum | 13.7% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 86.3% | 96.1% |
Mean | 39.5% | 39.4% |
Median | 30.2% | 33.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.5% | 21.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 45.7% | 55.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.3% | 33.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.8% | 26.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.5% | 25.9% |
Demographics Similar to Welsh and Icelanders by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from Western Africa (22.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Tlingit-Haida (21.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Salvadoran (21.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ghana (21.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Portugal (21.9%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Ecuadorian (21.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Barbados (21.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |
Panamanians | 9.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 21.7% |
Germans | 8.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 8.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 7.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 21.8% |
Scottish | 7.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 21.8% |
Barbadians | 7.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 21.8% |
English | 6.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 5.8 /100 | #226 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 21.9% |
Salvadorans | 5.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 21.9% |
Tlingit-Haida | 5.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 22.0% |
Welsh | 5.0 /100 | #231 | Tragic 22.0% |