Puget Sound Salish vs Icelander Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Icelander
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Icelanders
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Icelander Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,841,624 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,245,143 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 5.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Icelander |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 40.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 32.2% | 96.1% |
| Mean | 20.9% | 39.4% |
| Median | 20.0% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 55.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 33.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 26.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 25.9% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Guamanian/Chamorro (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
| Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
| Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
| Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
| Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
| Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 13.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 21.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 21.7% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 11.7 /100 | #217 | Poor 21.7% |
| Nepalese | 9.7 /100 | #218 | Tragic 21.7% |