Basque vs Icelander Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Basque
Icelander
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Basques
Icelanders
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
28.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Icelander Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,728,632 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,245,143 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Basque | Icelander |
Minimum | 6.1% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 93.9% | 96.1% |
Mean | 29.2% | 39.4% |
Median | 22.6% | 33.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.2% | 21.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.4% | 55.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 33.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.9% | 26.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.8% | 25.9% |
Demographics Similar to Basques and Icelanders by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Jamaican (21.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Panama (21.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (21.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Haitian (21.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Ghanaian (21.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |
Belgians | 16.1 /100 | #206 | Poor 21.5% |
Ghanaians | 15.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 21.6% |
Haitians | 15.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 21.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 21.6% |
Icelanders | 14.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 21.6% |
Jamaicans | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 21.6% |