Belizean vs British Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Belizean
British
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Belizeans
British
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belizean vs British Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,932,988 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,525,466 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 52.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Belizean | British |
| Minimum | 0.96% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 16.5% | 50.0% |
| Range | 15.5% | 47.6% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 11.5% |
| Median | 6.5% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 11.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Belizeans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Lebanon (6.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Nepalese (6.5%, a difference of 0.26%), Arapaho (6.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Salvadoran (6.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to British by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |