Immigrants from Australia vs Ute Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Ute
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Ute
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia vs Ute Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,453,715 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,519,789 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 28.4%, a difference of 46.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia | Ute |
| Minimum | 3.5% | 18.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 96.5% | 82.0% |
| Mean | 28.1% | 43.7% |
| Median | 21.4% | 37.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 27.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.7% | 43.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 16.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 22.9% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |