Yakama vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Yakama
Pima
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Yakama
Pima
79.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Pima In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,914,552 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302 and weighted average of 79.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%, a difference of 0.12%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Pima |
| Minimum | 43.8% | 46.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.2% | 53.6% |
| Mean | 79.0% | 79.8% |
| Median | 81.1% | 81.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 69.8% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 85.6% | 95.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.8% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 16.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 15.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Pima by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Hopi (79.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Hopi (79.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |