Yakama vs Pima Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Yakama
 Pima
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Yakama
Pima
3.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Pima Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,800 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,536,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 6.3%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Pima | 
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.0% | 
| Maximum | 16.7% | 13.0% | 
| Range | 14.6% | 12.0% | 
| Mean | 6.5% | 5.4% | 
| Median | 5.4% | 4.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 6.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 2.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 2.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Pima by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Puget Sound Salish (3.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hopi (3.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Cajun (3.9%, a difference of 0.28%), American (3.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Cree (3.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), German (3.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and Scottish (3.7%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% | 
| French | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| English | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 3.8% | 
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 3.9% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 3.9% | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 3.9% | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 3.9% | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 3.9% |