Yakama vs Albanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Yakama
Albanian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Yakama
Albanians
22.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Albanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,841,501 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 22.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,280,277 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.472 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 46.5%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Albanian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 87.7% | 22.2% |
| Range | 85.7% | 20.8% |
| Mean | 29.9% | 11.4% |
| Median | 25.6% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.0% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.3% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.3% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.8% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.4% | 5.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Yakama by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Colville (22.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Congo (22.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Demographics Similar to Albanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Scottish (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| English | 92.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |