Macedonian vs Brazilian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Macedonian
Brazilian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Macedonians
Brazilians
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
78.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Brazilian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,044,317 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.041 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,555,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226 and weighted average of 5.0%, a difference of 13.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Brazilian |
| Minimum | 0.82% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 17.2% | 14.2% |
| Range | 16.3% | 13.0% |
| Mean | 3.9% | 5.4% |
| Median | 3.7% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.7% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Macedonians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Serbia (4.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Canada (4.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Slavic (4.4%, a difference of 0.19%), New Zealander (4.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Korea (4.5%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Slavs | 99.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| New Zealanders | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.3 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Immigrants from Oceania (5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cameroon (5.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Albanian (5.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 83.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Hmong | 83.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 5.0% |
| Mongolians | 79.8 /100 | #146 | Good 5.0% |
| Syrians | 78.7 /100 | #147 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
| Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
| Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |