Ute vs Choctaw Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Choctaw
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Ute
Choctaw
35.7%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.4%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Choctaw Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,474,720 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 35.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,090,747 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509 and weighted average of 36.4%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Choctaw |
Minimum | 21.7% | 24.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 78.3% | 76.0% |
Mean | 53.3% | 53.6% |
Median | 47.4% | 51.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.9% | 42.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.2% | 58.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.3% | 16.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.8% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.3% | 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Choctaw by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Seminole (35.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Ottawa (35.5%, a difference of 0.48%), Kiowa (35.5%, a difference of 0.69%), Black/African American (35.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Paiute (35.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Yakama (36.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Apache (36.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Native/Alaskan (36.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Creek (36.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and Dutch West Indian (36.8%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 34.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 34.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 34.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 34.8% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 34.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 35.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 35.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 35.7% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 35.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 36.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 36.4% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 36.6% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 36.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 36.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 36.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 37.1% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 37.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 37.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 38.5% |