South American vs Celtic Male Poverty
COMPARE
South American
Celtic
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
South Americans
Celtics
11.1%
MALE POVERTY
53.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
47.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Celtic Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,234,153 people shows no correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,829,630 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.62%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Celtic |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.22% |
Maximum | 22.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 21.6% | 99.8% |
Mean | 10.8% | 14.6% |
Median | 10.6% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 16.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Celtics by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Colombia (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Portugal (11.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Hungarian (11.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Albania (11.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Fiji (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Lebanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Oceania (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (11.2%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 11.2% |
Immigrants | Syria | 40.3 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 40.1 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 39.5 /100 | #181 | Fair 11.3% |
Mongolians | 39.0 /100 | #182 | Fair 11.3% |