Somali vs Immigrants from Uganda Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Somali
Immigrants from Uganda
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Somalis
Immigrants from Uganda
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
54.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Immigrants from Uganda Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,100,573 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,662,794 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 11.6%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Somali | Immigrants from Uganda |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.25% |
Maximum | 31.7% | 22.9% |
Range | 30.7% | 22.6% |
Mean | 7.0% | 5.8% |
Median | 5.2% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 5.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Somalis by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Chickasaw (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uganda by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Ottawa (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Bermudan (5.2%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Alsatian (5.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 51.3 /100 | #172 | Average 5.2% |
Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |