Somali vs Filipino Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Somali
Filipino
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Somalis
Filipinos
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Somali vs Filipino Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,100,573 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Somalis and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.790 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,645,683 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 43.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Somali | Filipino |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 31.7% | 7.5% |
| Range | 30.7% | 7.0% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 3.7% |
| Median | 5.2% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 1.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Somalis by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Somalis are Chickasaw (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Filipinos by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.010%), German (4.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |