Marshallese vs Immigrants from China Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Marshallese
Immigrants from China
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Marshallese
Immigrants from China
16.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
3.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Immigrants from China Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,927,336 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 348,182,579 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 13.2%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Marshallese | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.43% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 30.8% |
Range | 98.1% | 30.3% |
Mean | 26.1% | 14.1% |
Median | 16.3% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.5% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.1% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.4% | 6.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Senegalese (16.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Germany (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Subsaharan African (16.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Grenada (16.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
British | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 16.8% |
Belgians | 5.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 16.8% |
Israelis | 4.6 /100 | #229 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 4.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 16.8% |
Spanish Americans | 3.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 3.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 16.9% |
Senegalese | 3.2 /100 | #233 | Tragic 16.9% |
Marshallese | 3.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 2.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 2.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 16.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 16.9% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 16.9% |
Bermudans | 2.6 /100 | #239 | Tragic 16.9% |
Finns | 2.6 /100 | #240 | Tragic 16.9% |
Czechs | 2.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Malaysian (14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Bhutanese (15.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Pima | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 15.0% |