Bhutanese vs Immigrants from China Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from China
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from China
15.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.9%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from China Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 350,288,163 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 348,182,579 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.081 and weighted average of 14.9%, a difference of 0.21%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 0.92% | 0.43% |
Maximum | 84.3% | 30.8% |
Range | 83.3% | 30.3% |
Mean | 17.6% | 14.1% |
Median | 14.7% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.8% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.3% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 6.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from China by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Pakistan (15.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (15.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from El Salvador (15.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kenya (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Malaysian (14.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Malaysian (14.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cambodia (14.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (15.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Pima | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | China | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 15.1% |