Lithuanian vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Tsimshian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Tsimshian
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 412,150,693 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,615,751 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 0.55%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 6.1% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 57.6% | 41.7% |
| Range | 51.5% | 37.1% |
| Mean | 22.8% | 23.7% |
| Median | 19.4% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 30.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Tsimshian by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Cambodian (19.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Russian (19.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Cypriot (19.2%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (19.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cypriots | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Palestinians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 19.2% |