Lithuanian vs Macedonian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
 Macedonian
 Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Macedonians
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Macedonian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 412,150,693 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,464,116 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.010 and weighted average of 18.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
 
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Macedonian | 
| Minimum | 6.1% | 3.0% | 
| Maximum | 57.6% | 40.0% | 
| Range | 51.5% | 37.0% | 
| Mean | 22.8% | 17.9% | 
| Median | 19.4% | 17.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 13.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 21.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 7.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 7.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 6.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Macedonians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Cambodian (19.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Russian (19.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (19.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Sri Lankan (19.2%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 18.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 18.9%  | 
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 18.9%  | 
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 19.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 19.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 19.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 19.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51  | Exceptional 19.0%  | 
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52  | Exceptional 19.1%  | 
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53  | Exceptional 19.1%  | 
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54  | Exceptional 19.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55  | Exceptional 19.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56  | Exceptional 19.1%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57  | Exceptional 19.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58  | Exceptional 19.1%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59  | Exceptional 19.2%  | 
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60  | Exceptional 19.2%  | 
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61  | Exceptional 19.2%  | 
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62  | Exceptional 19.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63  | Exceptional 19.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 99.6 /100 | #64  | Exceptional 19.2%  |