Turkish vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Tsimshian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Turks
Tsimshian
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,182,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,615,751 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 2.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Tsimshian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 67.9% | 41.7% |
| Range | 66.2% | 37.1% |
| Mean | 20.0% | 23.7% |
| Median | 16.6% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.5% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 30.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.8% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Tsimshian by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |