Immigrants from Bahamas vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Tsimshian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Tsimshian
22.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
1.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,304,662 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 22.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,615,751 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 17.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 1.1% | 4.5% |
Maximum | 64.6% | 41.7% |
Range | 63.5% | 37.1% |
Mean | 23.9% | 23.7% |
Median | 21.9% | 23.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.8% | 14.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 30.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.1% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.0% | 10.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from West Indies (22.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Caribbean (22.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Belizean (22.4%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from El Salvador (22.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Delaware (22.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 1.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 22.3% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 22.3% |
Liberians | 1.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 22.4% |
Belizeans | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 1.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 22.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (19.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |