Korean vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Korean
 Tsimshian
 Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Koreans
Tsimshian
18.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Korean vs Tsimshian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,036,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Koreans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,615,751 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.445 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 2.6%.
 
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Korean | Tsimshian | 
| Minimum | 1.8% | 4.5% | 
| Maximum | 56.2% | 41.7% | 
| Range | 54.5% | 37.1% | 
| Mean | 17.8% | 23.7% | 
| Median | 16.1% | 23.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.4% | 14.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.2% | 30.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 16.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 10.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 10.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Koreans and Tsimshian by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Koreans are Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 18.6%  | 
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 18.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 18.6%  | 
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 18.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 18.7%  | 
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 18.8%  | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 18.8%  | 
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 18.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 18.8%  | 
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 18.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 18.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 18.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 18.9%  | 
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 18.9%  | 
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 19.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 19.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 19.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 19.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51  | Exceptional 19.0%  | 
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52  | Exceptional 19.1%  | 
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53  | Exceptional 19.1%  |