Latvian vs Cypriot Female Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Cypriot
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Cypriots
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Cypriot Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,618,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,838,205 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.377 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Cypriot |
Minimum | 0.50% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 31.3% | 28.6% |
Range | 30.8% | 27.1% |
Mean | 10.2% | 9.4% |
Median | 9.6% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 12.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Cypriots by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Danish (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Singapore (11.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Polish (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Greek (11.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.7%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |