Latvian vs Pima Vision Disability
COMPARE
Latvian
Pima
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Latvians
Pima
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Pima Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,626,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,535,675 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 3.3%, a difference of 67.9%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.25% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 7.5% | 21.0% |
| Range | 7.3% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 5.5% |
| Median | 1.9% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Afghan (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Israeli (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.0%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Lumbee (3.4%, a difference of 1.6%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and Houma (3.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |