Indonesian vs Samoan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Indonesian
Samoan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Indonesians
Samoans
6.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indonesian vs Samoan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,334,988 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.301 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,354,255 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 29.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indonesian | Samoan |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.90% |
| Maximum | 33.8% | 26.3% |
| Range | 32.6% | 25.4% |
| Mean | 7.9% | 5.3% |
| Median | 6.3% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 3.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Indonesians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Choctaw (6.3%, a difference of 0.59%), Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and Barbadian (6.3%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.2% |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Soviet Union (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (4.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Egyptians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Palestinians | 91.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.7 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Soviet Union | 90.7 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.5 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.4 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 90.2 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Samoans | 90.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 89.4 /100 | #135 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #136 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 86.5 /100 | #137 | Excellent 4.9% |
| Chileans | 86.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 4.9% |
| German Russians | 85.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 84.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.0% |