Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Osage Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Osage
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Osage
12.2%
MALE POVERTY
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
MALE POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Osage Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,712,457 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,789,808 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Osage |
| Minimum | 0.066% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 32.1% | 32.1% |
| Range | 32.0% | 30.2% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 13.9% |
| Median | 9.2% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Osage by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Cambodia (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Thailand (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), German Russian (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Japanese (12.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Bermudan (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Nigeria (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (12.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Alaska Native (12.4%, a difference of 0.26%), Alsatian (12.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Cuban (12.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Moroccans | 4.2 /100 | #210 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 4.0 /100 | #211 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Americans | 3.2 /100 | #212 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Japanese | 2.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 2.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 2.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 12.2% |
| German Russians | 2.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Bermudans | 2.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Ugandans | 2.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.1 /100 | #222 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.1 /100 | #223 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #225 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.4 /100 | #227 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Alsatians | 1.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Cubans | 1.3 /100 | #229 | Tragic 12.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 12.5% |