Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Chinese
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,559,356 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 24.4%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 40.0% | 19.1% |
| Range | 38.1% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 9.6% | 6.8% |
| Median | 7.4% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Slavic (8.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Laotian (8.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |