South American Indian vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
South American Indians
Chinese
9.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
38.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,455,459 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098 and weighted average of 9.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 40.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.6% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 19.1% |
Range | 30.7% | 17.8% |
Mean | 9.3% | 6.8% |
Median | 7.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.4% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (9.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Uruguayan (9.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Morocco (9.1%, a difference of 0.20%), Hmong (9.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Colombian (9.2%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Hawaiians | 47.2 /100 | #177 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 47.1 /100 | #178 | Average 9.0% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 44.4 /100 | #179 | Average 9.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 43.4 /100 | #180 | Average 9.1% |
Hmong | 40.2 /100 | #181 | Average 9.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 40.2 /100 | #182 | Average 9.1% |
Uruguayans | 39.2 /100 | #183 | Fair 9.1% |
South American Indians | 38.7 /100 | #184 | Fair 9.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 38.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 9.1% |
Colombians | 36.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 9.2% |
Delaware | 35.4 /100 | #187 | Fair 9.2% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 34.0 /100 | #188 | Fair 9.2% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 32.1 /100 | #189 | Fair 9.2% |
Arabs | 31.5 /100 | #190 | Fair 9.2% |
Ugandans | 28.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |